@0xj4an-work@LuukDAO, why the urgency? Announcing a governance call to discuss such a significant proposal only a day in advance, instead of on Friday, is unacceptable. It does not encourage community participation in discussions about Celo governance and frankly, it looks bad. Unfortunately, I can’t attend on such short notice, but I hope you can record the call and still address the points I raised in the discussion thread.
Unfortunately, I can also not attend due to the short notice of this call. I would like to receive the notes on what was discussed and still believe a proper call/meeting should be scheduled with the attendance of @eladmin and more to have space for dialogue around the recent Celo Governance proposal. Looking forward to another or the regular call date @0xj4an-work@LuukDAO .
Hi Elad, we mentioned rescheduling on the last call on Friday last week that we would be rescheduling this or next week. Due to CGP editor schedules this was the only suitable time.
I’ll take fault for not getting word out faster due to issues scheduling Luma and Google Calendar, and adding to appropriate community calendars.
This call will be recorded. Please review, and if you feel more questions need answering then we can discuss another call.
Sorry for last minute announcement of the call. I know it was a little bit rushed.
Agree with you @eladmin but the necessity of this call was due to the impossibility of @LuukDAO to present the proposal last call and due to a lot of interactions and questions expected in his proposal this governance Call are gonna be held only to present this proposal.
For this reason @Airu@mitchelle@Xolutionist is not posible you can present proposals in this call, but you will have the possibility to schedule your proposals for the next Regular Governance Call.
Record of the call and notes will be posted later as normally we did at the CGP table on Github.