Hey @NikoG
First of all, I want to express my general alignment with the proposal’s direction. The move toward a more structured Regional Hub framework is an exciting evolution that aligns with the need for scalability, transparency, and coordination.
However, I do have some specific concerns regarding autonomy and budget constraints. Here are a few thoughts and questions I’d like to share, which I’m sure will expand as we further digest thos proposal in the coming days.
Concerns about Budget Reductions
My primary concern lies in the limited budget allocation for mature DAOs, such as Africa and Europe. Based on the proposed budget caps, the maximum funding for Europe would be $150k, representing a reduction of over 35% compared to the past year. This is a significant decrease in resources, especially at a time when Regional DAOs are expected to pivot toward securing alternative funding sources.
The transition to new funding models requires both time and resources. A reduction of this magnitude risks undermining the ability of mature DAOs to make this shift effectively, potentially slowing down momentum.
Balancing Value and Autonomy
I strongly agree with the need for a Coordinator Hub, but I believe its role must go beyond acting as an intermediary. It should add real value to the ecosystem by facilitating meaningful coordination, providing support, and avoiding becoming a centralized bottleneck.
There is a thin line between empowering Regional DAOs and centralizing power, and this balance must be carefully managed. The hub should focus on:
- Standardizing key processes and KPIs to ensure alignment.
- Allowing sufficient flexibility for Regional Hubs to maintain their creativity and adaptability.
Coordination Tools and Processes
I’ve previously suggested the use of open coordination tools like Notion to enhance transparency and streamline operations. However, the Celo Notion platform has shown outdated data and limited adoption, which raises concerns about how tools will be effectively implemented in this new framework.
I’d like to understand more about:
- How coordination will be operationalized within the proposed framework.
- How processes and KPIs will be standardized while preserving innovation.
- What tools and systems will ensure accountability while supporting regional flexibility.
A well-designed on-chain coordination tool could address many of these concerns. By being modular and capable of centralizing information from different stakeholders, such a tool could enhance transparency, efficiency, and accountability across the ecosystem.
Smaller Regional Hubs: Scaling with Support
The idea of promoting smaller regional hubs is compelling. However, I believe their success will depend heavily on support from larger, mature DAOs like Africa, Europe, and Latam. I cannot envision the Coordinator Hub managing all this information and oversight independently.
Instead, the Coordinator Hub could establish overarching guidelines, with mature DAOs taking on the role of supporting and coordinating smaller hubs. For instance, in the case of Celo EU:
- Celo EU could assist in the creation of smaller hubs, ensuring alignment with broader goals while maintaining seamless coordination with the Coordinator Hub.
This “last-mile” approach would scale operations effectively without overburdening the Coordinator Hub, leveraging the expertise of established DAOs. And the same can be applied for ambassador
Accountability and Audits
I am fully aligned with the proposal to increase accountability and audits. These are essential not only for financial transparency but also for ensuring operational effectiveness.
I also believe that personal accountability should be emphasized. To achieve this, an on-chain accountability program could be instrumental. By centralizing data from various players and stakeholders in a modular, transparent manner, such a system could:
- Provide real-time insights into performance.
- Foster collaboration.
- Strengthen trust and alignment across the ecosystem.
Overall, I see a lot of potential in this proposed evolution, and I appreciate the thoughtful approach taken. Addressing these concerns—particularly around budget, autonomy, and operational details—will be critical to ensuring the long-term success of the Regional Hub framework.
Looking forward to further discussions on this important topic!