In contrast, we respectfully disagree with @martinvol’s viewpoint. We believe that the ethos of the network should embrace those who contribute to its growth by providing new infrastructure and decentralization opportunities.
I also agree with this… that’s the reason we have the rewards handled by a smart contract.
I think it’s very dangerous to rewards people retroactively, everyone can come up for n case why they should get more rewards.
I don’t understand what the project will win with this proposal, demand to be a validator is already oversubscribed and we’re about to bump the rewards significantly.
I also think the proposals should never co-exists, that’s a hard double tipping in IMO.