[DRAFT] Artemis Proposal to Build Public Goods Data Dashboards for Celo Ecosystem and Community

[LuukDAO]

Given the USD needs, I believe the better route here is requesting a budget primarily for cUSD.

Given that cUSD is stable and simple to convert, would a request in the following range function for your team?
175,000 cUSD +
50,000 CELO

I’ve downvoted the current proposal because I feel 0.5M CELO is too significant of an ask, especially if it’s likely to be sold into the market in the next year.

[andromedae88]

Good morning Luuk!

I spoke with the team and we understand your concern about sell pressure given the recent draw-down in price, so your proposal range works for us (and cUSD would be better for us since our expenses are paid out in USD).

Should I update this proposal or create a new proposal given that this one will end in <24hrs?

Thanks!

[LuukDAO]

Hi @andromedae88 - I’m glad the proposed setup is doable for your team. I’m confident this updated ask will have a greater chance of passing a governance vote!

The best would be to let the current proposal time out, create a new Forum thread with your latest proposal (it is good to add [FINAL] in the title), and submit it to Governance any time this week.

[0xj4an-work]

Hello @andromedae88

Your proposal is up for vote at the moment, I will recommend you to wait until it ends and due to the fact that maybe your proposal will be rejected, maybe you should address community concerns before submitting it again.

Also you should take a look at the CoolOff periods for proposals. At the moment I am writing this post your proposal is not reaching the Quorum, but also has majority of NO votes.

@0xj4an-work

Cool-off period for failed proposals

If a proposal is not accepted, a so-called cool-off or rest period for additional conversation and potential changes is started before the proposal can be resubmitted again.

• If a proposal is rejected due to not reaching a quorum but having a majority of yes votes, the proposal is moved back to the discussion stage and may be submitted for a vote after waiting for 14 days.
• If a proposal is rejected and has a majority of no votes, the proposal is moved back to the discussion stage and may be submitted for a vote after receiving approval from the Governance Guardians and waiting for 28 days.
• Note: In the event that a proposal meets or exceeds quorum, but if it is not approved in time, then they should be able to re-submit as soon as they are able. This would happen in a rare situations when approvers are unable to approve in the 72 hour window following a referendum vote.

Also please when you repost your proposal try to be sure that you fulffill this requirement before submitting it On-Chain.

@0xj4an-work

To proceed to the submission and voting phase at least two Celo Governance Guardians or CPG Stewards (depends of the scope of the proposal) must post explicitly that the proposal fulfills the requirements to be able to move into the Voting Stage in the proposal thread on the Celo Forum.

Your proposal fits under the Main On-Chain Celo Governance Proposals try to reach out some other Celo Governance Guardians

@0xj4an-work

Celo makes decisions through governance proposals. A new proposal must be of the proposal type listed below and follow the voting process described in this document to be considered valid. Proposals are accepted or rejected using a voting process.

An illustrative diagram of how to know where your proposal fits is showed here

[Thylacine]

Given the subject matter of the proposal, and even mentions of Stabila in the application - is this request not better suited to being funded by Stabila itself (which itself was founded recently on a 5M CELO successful governance proposal). Aren’t initiatives like this what Stabilia was created for?

Apologies if this comment is out of touch but just wondering about the connection here.

[0xj4an-work]

Hello

I want to let everyone know that Artemis Proposal was submitted again for Vote by mistake. So please avoid voting on this proposal, this proposal is gonna be rejected by the Approvers.

Sorry for the confusion.