@deepak I don’t think it’s possible with the way the governance contract works.
@Yaz @deepak @ericnakagawa if you see good use of the community funds in the next months or years then I agree that proposal might slow down the community development and I don’t think proposing it is a good idea anymore.
I also get the ‘temporary permanent’ argument, which I think would likely not develop that way, but I don’t know enough about governance dynamics to have a strong opinion and trust that you can better evaluate that than me.
Maybe the better decision would be to skip the temporary changes for community fund + validators, accept and closely monitor the epoch rewards downscaling, and start working on revamping the epoch rewards mechanism for better long-term incentives with higher priority.