Indeed, liquidity is important for any token to becoming successful. A few comments here: 1) Liquidity management should be focused on AMM/DEX 2) Remove direct pairing <cCOP, cEURO>, <cCOP, cREAL> so as to concentrated liquidity in <cCOP, CELO> and <cCOP, cUSD> and rely on routing to different currencies like cEURO, cREAL. 3) What is the target market cap of cCOP along the timeline since this will impact the liquidity needed?
The liquidity challenge can be better solved by using Double since it will open to all CELO holders to support cCOP. For tapping the Celo Community Fund for liquidity, we are currently working on a governance proposal to request a portion of the CELO in the Celo Community Fund to support all Celo token projects via Double, and we can loop cCOP’s liquidity request into this proposal.
On a different note: the key to success of cCOP is to drive the adoption of cCOP. I would encourage the team to focus on the task of driving adoption. And hence maybe it is better to separate the marketing plan into another governance proposal.