# The Celo Ecosystem Treasury

**URL:** <https://forum.celo.org/t/the-celo-ecosystem-treasury/1313>\
**Category:** Governance\
**Created:** [September 3, 2021, 6:03pm UTC](https://forum.celo.org/t/the-celo-ecosystem-treasury/1313 "2021-09-03T18:03:42Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 33

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pinotio.com](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.celo.org/pinotio.com/32/264_2.png) [@Pinotio.com](https://forum.celo.org/u/Pinotio.com)\
**Post date:** [September 24, 2021, 11:15am UTC](https://forum.celo.org/t/the-celo-ecosystem-treasury/1313/33 "2021-09-24T11:15:25Z")

</div>

Congrats on pulling this together @Yaz .

- I support getting funds out there flexibility and in large amount.
- I also support @sep 's points around a) trying to get more non cLabs sigs (or at least commit to cycling them out) - it would be ideal to have just one or two cLabs on the multi-sig within a 1-2 year time frame, b) returning funds over $15M - I think this is bold and wise.

In terms of prioritisation I’ve summarised in this cLabs priorities post some areas I think Celo can excel at: [cLabs Product Priorities - #2 by Pinotio.com](https://forum.celo.org/t/clabs-product-priorities/1395/2)

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.celo.org/t/the-celo-ecosystem-treasury/1313)._