Thanks for commenting @OzKar! This is a very valuable and timely question. For this specific round and previous rounds, the mentioned metrics were not tracked(although they may be useful). This is partly due to not being an overall determining factor for the teams/projects to receive a grant not factoring in the metrics so it may be unfair to judge accordingly. We utilized a set of rubrics(find each of the rubrics on the relevant pool) for each of the pools and a varied review team of 5 reviewers from various regions and specialties. We were not specifically targeting the mentioned outcomes rather than funding projects that best met the rubrics.
We have actually been thinking about this for a while and trying to determine the best way to capture these. Part of this is our endeavour(not just Prezenti but the ecosystem as a whole) to utilize and standardize Karma Gap as ecosystem wide source of truth about what projects, programs and outcomes/metrics surrounding these.
With this being said, the latest discussions and the ecosystem moving towards intents for season 1 will make this much easier to capture and compare against other ecosystems and programs. We have preemptively modified and created an application form around the metrics you mentioned in anticipation for proposing a couple of new rounds for season 1. These will be tracked via Karma Gap. Some metrics are already available while we will work with the team for ones that are not.
We hope this helps clarify some of your questions and are always open for suggestions and feedback