# Fix USA₮ and XAU₮0 fee distribution in FeeHandler

**URL:** https://forum.celo.org/t/fix-usa-and-xau-0-fee-distribution-in-feehandler/13828
**Category:** Governance
**Created:** [September 25, 2026, 12:13pm UTC](https://forum.celo.org/t/fix-usa-and-xau-0-fee-distribution-in-feehandler/13828 "2026-09-25T12:13:12Z")
**Posts on this page:** 2
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![pahor](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/4af34b/32.png) [@pahor](https://forum.celo.org/u/pahor)
#### Post date: [September 25, 2026, 12:13pm UTC](https://forum.celo.org/t/fix-usa-and-xau-0-fee-distribution-in-feehandler/13828/1 "2026-09-25T12:13:13Z")

</div>

[CGP-0240]([governance/CGPs/cgp-0240.md at main · celo-org/governance · GitHub](https://github.com/celo-org/governance/blob/main/CGPs/cgp-0240.md)) added the USA₮ and XAU₮0 fee currency adapters to `FeeHandler`, instead of the underlying tokens. Gas fees are paid to `FeeHandler` in the underlying tokens, but it can’t distribute them because the adapters have no `transfer` method.

**## Proposal**

Register the underlying tokens and remove the adapters. The already collected fees are then distributed by the regular `FeeHandler` flow.

\* Destination: FeeHandler (`0xcD437749E43A154C07F3553504c68fBfD56B8778`)

\* Data:

1. `addToken(0xD2ab3C9A02DBBAB236BfEC45D1d755DF4267F771, 0xD3aeE28548Dbb65DF03981f0dC0713BfCBd10a97)` (USA₮)

2. `addToken(0xaf37E8B6C9ED7f6318979f56Fc287d76c30847ff, 0xD3aeE28548Dbb65DF03981f0dC0713BfCBd10a97)` (XAU₮0)

3. `removeToken(0x0357EE22278c922e1D36cFe6b899269b161880C4)` (USA₮ adapter)

4. `removeToken(0x857BF24e29da0773687E804a743c2E421a394C16)` (XAU₮0 adapter)

\* Value: 0

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![ttghi](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.celo.org/ttghi/32/12212_2.png) [@ttghi](https://forum.celo.org/u/ttghi)
#### Post date: [September 25, 2026, 3:09pm UTC](https://forum.celo.org/t/fix-usa-and-xau-0-fee-distribution-in-feehandler/13828/2 "2026-09-25T15:09:50Z")

</div>

I see that the fees already paid to the feehandler would then get distributed, can this be tested? And does the community need to vote to get this into production?
