# Discussion on Celo Epoch Rewards

**URL:** <https://forum.celo.org/t/discussion-on-celo-epoch-rewards/1105>\
**Category:** Protocol\
**Created:** [June 17, 2021, 9:01am UTC](https://forum.celo.org/t/discussion-on-celo-epoch-rewards/1105 "2021-06-17T09:01:38Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 28

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tobi](https://sea2.discourse-cdn.com/flex020/user_avatar/forum.celo.org/tobi/32/367_2.png) [@Tobi](https://forum.celo.org/u/Tobi)\
**Post date:** [August 4, 2021, 8:51am UTC](https://forum.celo.org/t/discussion-on-celo-epoch-rewards/1105/28 "2021-08-04T08:51:14Z")

</div>

Based on the pretty lively discussion about the community fund ([Community Fund: CGP 35 and how can we use those funds? - #12 by Tobi](https://forum.celo.org/t/community-fund-cgp-35-and-how-can-we-use-those-funds/1250/12)) where new resistance for CGP 35 & 36 (community fund & validator rewards) arose I’d like to follow up here:

Maybe the better decision would be to skip the temporary changes for community fund + validators and only propose dynamic voting yield + target voting fraction of 60%. To accept and closely monitor the epoch rewards downscaling, and start working on revamping the epoch rewards mechanism for better long-term incentives with higher priority.

What do you think @asa @Pinotio.com ?

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.celo.org/t/discussion-on-celo-epoch-rewards/1105)._