# cLabs Proposal for Celo to transition to an Ethereum L2

**URL:** <https://forum.celo.org/t/clabs-proposal-for-celo-to-transition-to-an-ethereum-l2/6109>\
**Category:** Protocol\
**Created:** [July 15, 2023, 6:20am UTC](https://forum.celo.org/t/clabs-proposal-for-celo-to-transition-to-an-ethereum-l2/6109 "2023-07-15T06:20:21Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 16

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Erayda](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/e480ec/32.png) [@Erayda](https://forum.celo.org/u/Erayda)\
**Post date:** [July 16, 2023, 11:06am UTC](https://forum.celo.org/t/clabs-proposal-for-celo-to-transition-to-an-ethereum-l2/6109/16 "2023-07-16T11:06:15Z")

</div>

If we are going to migrate to Ethereum L2, why did we accept ChainLink’s heavy conditions? There was no need for that. This makes me think that this transition was a sudden decision. And it might indicate that the team hasn’t been very transparent about the reasons that make this L1\>L2 transformation necessary.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.celo.org/t/clabs-proposal-for-celo-to-transition-to-an-ethereum-l2/6109)._
